FutureFemHealth

FutureFemHealth

Better diagnostics aren’t enough in preeclampsia

New treatments are emerging for preeclampsia. Could they also change the market for diagnosing it?

Anna O'Sullivan's avatar
Anna O'Sullivan
Oct 27, 2026
∙ Paid

Earlier this year, I spoke with the Preeclampsia Foundation about its work to help doctors adopt new blood tests for preeclampsia.

I hadn’t realised just how much education and advocacy was needed to encourage doctors to use these tests. Surely, I thought, better tests for such a serious pregnancy complication would be welcomed into routine care?

Preeclampsia affects up to 8% of pregnancies worldwide and can cause serious complications for mothers and babies, including premature birth and, in severe cases, death.

As I reported in February, there are several reasons why adoption has been difficult, from lab requirements and reimbursement to questions about how test results should influence care.

But there’s also something more fundamental at play, and it's made me curious about the wider market for preeclampsia diagnostics and what might change in the future.

After a flurry of activity throughout September and October, including funding announcements, clinical trial progress, and a new global roadmap from the World Health Organization, now felt like the right time.

Continue reading for a look at what’s holding back preeclampsia diagnostics, the companies developing new tests and treatments, and what could change.

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to FutureFemHealth to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2026 FutureFemHealth Ltd · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture