Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sarah's avatar

Loved reading this, Anna!

Putting a specialist's pathway into software for family physicians is a direct answer to the standard ten-minute GP appointment (that we all know so well)! One thing I'd love to see is each step labelled by what it rests on, trial evidence or expert consensus? Since that distinction can get lost between a guideline and the exam room. It would matter most in the weight management expansion, where trial evidence for women-specific conditions is often small...

Unfolders's avatar

Encoding specialist pathways into primary care raises an important implementation question. How will the system preserve room for atypical presentations and make escalation visible to both clinician and patient, especially when the pathway expands beyond menopause? The safety test may be how clearly it handles cases that do not fit its own logic.

Ready for more?